Charges against Chief Director: Roads Management....
CHARGE 1 You contravened section 45(1) (b) (c) of the Public Finance Management Act (“PFMA”) in that you failed and/or neglected to act responsibly in order to ensure the effective, efficient, economical and transparent use of financial and other resources of the government and/or Sate and\or the Department within your official area of responsibility; You have failed to take and appropriate steps to prevent within your area of responsibility, any unauthorized expenditure, irregular expenditure and fruitless and wasteful expenditure which was ultimately incurred by the Government and/or State and/or Department; In that, on 20 October 2008 you caused the DPC to extent for a period of 4 months and to include Roucomm Systems, Moseme Construction and Kaulani Civils in the expired list of constructors that have been appointed to do emergency road patchwork, potholes and maintenance without following procurement procedures in place, resulting in the department contracting with the said companies to the tune of R424 240 000.00 when you have in fact misrepresented either intentionally or negligently that the amount of R30 000 000.00 was set aside for the CAPEX budget; You are therefore guilty of gross misconduct. On 29 July 2008 you provided false information to the DPC to the effect that, the jetpatcher machine from Raliform will cost the department R1 800 00.00 whereas you made the department to pay Raliform the amount of R9 690 000.00 for the machine. The jetpatcher machine would have cost the department R1 200 000.00 per unit excluding VAT from Jetpatcher (Pty) Ltd who had demonstrated the machine’s capability to the department’s officials, including yourself. As a result of your conduct, you have caused the department to incur fruitless and wasteful expenditure. You are therefore guilty of gross misconduct. ALTERNATIVE TO CHARGE 2 You have
contravened the provisions of section 45(b)(c) of the PFMA
in that you failed to act responsibly in order to
ensure the effective, efficient, economical and transparent
use of financial and other resources of the government OR State
or Department, when on or about 29 July 2008 you provided false
information to the DPC to the effect that the jetpatcher machine
from Raliform will cause the department R1 800 000.00 while
it caused the department to pay Raliform R9 690 000.00 for
the machines at the time aforesaid, you knew or you ought to
have known that the aforesaid machine would merely cost the
department R1 200 000.00 per unit excluding VAT from Jetpatcher
(Pty) Ltd which had made demonstration of the machines capability
to the department’s officials including yourself. As
a result of your misrepresentation the department suffered
actual prejudice by paying R 9 690 000.00 when it could have
paid R1 200 000.00 per unit excluding VAT. CHARGE 3 On or about 29 July 2008, you caused the department to pay
Raliform R2 442 500.00 for a jetpatcher machine that the department
could have otherwise purchased from the Jetpatcher (Pty) Ltd
for R1 200 00.00 excluding VAT. In doing so, you directly or
indirectly accepted or agreed to be offered and to accept any
gratification from Raliform for the benefit that was not due
to you. CHARGE 4 On or about February 2009, you misrepresented to the department by which you caused the department to procure 100 drums of bitumen cationic emulsion 65 and paid Raliform Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd R282 013.20 which it could have paid R77 976.00 for the same quantity had the department procured from Tosas (Pty) Ltd. As a result of your misrepresentation and\or conduct you caused the department to suffer actual prejudice and financial loss in the sum R204 037.20. You are therefore guilty of gross misconduct. On or about
February 2009, you misrepresented to the department by which
you caused the department to procure 100 drums of bitumen
cationic emulsion 65 and paid Raliform Investment Holdings
(Pty) Ltd R282 013.20 which it could have paid R77 976.00
for the same quantity had the department procured from Tosas
(Pty) Ltd. As a result of your misrepresentation and\or conduct
you caused the department to suffer actual prejudice and
financial loss in the sum R204 037.20. On or about 10 November 2008 you provided false information to the DPC to the effect that, Raliform was a sole supplier of bitumen cationic emulsion 65 which resulted in the department paying R2 890.64 per unit whereas in truth and fact the department already had as existing contract with Tosas (Pty) Ltd to provide bitumen cationic emulsion 65 at R779.76 per unit. Your conduct constitute misrepresentation which caused the department to suffer actual loss in the sum of R 844 352.40 in that, the department procured 400 drums of bitumen cationic emulsion 65 and paid Raliform Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd R 1 156 256.40 when it could have paid R311 904.00 TO Tosas (Pty) Ltd for the same quantity. You are therefore guilty of gross misconduct. CHARGE 7 On or about 29 April 2009 you improperly and irregularly appointed the following companies, Godirela Civils which paid R2 969 561.05; Kaulani Civils, which paid R5 047 310.85 and Moseme Road Construction which paid R944 286.66 in terms of Tender No.NW062/05 and 061/05 respectively to do emergency patchwork and potholes without following procurement policy. Your conduct was in breach of section 45(1)(b)(c) of the PFMA. CHARGE 8 On or about 18 June 2009, you authorized the appointment of
consultants to do scoping for projects and also initiated and
committed funds for projects that were not listed in the infrastructure
projects management plan, thereby committing the department
to embark on irregular and /or wasteful expenditure as the
projects were not budgeted for. CHARGE 9 On or about 29 April 2009, you improperly and irregularly, appointed Kaulani Civils and Moseme Road Construction to do Patchwork and repairs of various roads in Rustenburg at the cost R5 552 061.03 AND r1 653 273.63 without following procurement procedures in place. As a result of your conduct, the department suffered prejudice. You are guilty of gross misconduct.
You are guilty of gross misconduct alternatively misconduct in that you prejudiced the administration, discipline and\or efficiency of the department in that during 2009 you caused the department to pay various service providers, sums of money which would not ordinarily have been due to the said service providers in disregard of the provisions of the Public Servant Management Act, thereby depleting the construction budget by 97.8% before the end of the financial year which resulted in the department being unable to realize the department’s mandate in that financial year. You are therefore guilty of gross misconduct.
|