
| MAIN RIVER | PRIMARY | SECONDARY | TERTIARY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limpopo River Catchment | |||
| Crocodile | Pienaars | Apies | |
| Elands | Selons | Koster | |
| Brakfonteinspruit | |||
| Hex | Waterkloofspruit | ||
| Sterkstroom | |||
| Magalies | Scheerpoort | Nouklip-oog | |
| Maloneys-oog | |||
| Swartspruit | |||
| Hennops | Rietspruit | ||
| Jukskei | Klein Jukskei | ||
| Bloubankspruit | |||
| Limpopo | Groot Marico | Klein Marico | |
| Vaal River Catchment | |||
| Vaal | Harts | Dry Harts | |
| Groot Harts | |||
| Klein Harts | |||
| Schoonspruit | Taaiboschspruit | ||
| Rietspruit | |||
| Mooi | Loopspruit | ||
| Molopo | Ramatlabamaspruit | ||
| Setlagolespruit | |||
| Ganyesaspruit | |||
| Pepanespruit | |||
Mean annual runoff in major river catchments - The mean annual runoff (MAR) in the North West Province is reported to be very low. Average MAR as a percentage of the precipitation is 6% for the entire Province, which is below the average of 9% for southern Africa. The MAR varies significantly from east to west ranging from approximately 7% in the eastern region to less than 1% in the far western region (Shulze, 1997). Table 10.1.2 presents the mean annual runoff (MAR) for the major catchments in the Province.
With the exception of the Vaal River and perennial streams which arise from springs, the rivers and streams of the North West Province are characterized by highly variable runoff, which increases from east to west. The high variability in runoff makes direct utilization by runoff-river abstraction unfeasible, with the exception of small consumers abstracting water from major rivers (Nel et al., 1995).
| River | MAR (106m3) |
|---|---|
| Crocodile River | 209.5 |
| Elands / Hex River | 112.3 |
| Marico River | 125.5 |
| Molopo River | 49.2 |
| Mooi River | 238.9 |
| Vaal River | 50.1 |
| Harts River | 147.7 |
| Station | Description | TDS | SO4 | F | Cl | TAL | Na | K | Mg | Ca |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2R001Q01 | Hartbeespoort Dam | 366 | 66 | 0.47 | 47.7 | 113.9 | 42.7 | 9.4 | 16.7 | 32.8 |
| A2R003Q01 | Olifantsnek Dam | 172.066 | 23.7 | 0.2 | 5 | 76.877 | 7.253 | 3.095 | 11.76 | 16.211 |
| A2R005Q01 | Buffelspoort Dam | 42.5 | 5.9 | 0.12 | 4.9 | 18.2 | 1.7 | 1.38 | 3.1 | 3.4 |
| A2R006Q01 | Bospoort Dam | 496 | 79.4 | 0.27 | 99.6 | 126.4 | 81.5 | 13.44 | 22.5 | 32.8 |
| A2R007Q01 | Lindleyspoort Dam | 128 | 12.6 | 0.22 | 5.2 | 65.693 | 5.7 | 3.54 | 8.1 | 11.786 |
| A2R011Q01 | Kosterrivier Dam | 149 | 11.3 | 0.26 | 5.5 | 79 | 6 | 3.69 | 9.8 | 14.8 |
| A2R012Q01 | Klipvoor Dam | 488 | 65.75 | 0.57 | 70.75 | 166.79 | 73.15 | 13.145 | 18.102 | 35.793 |
| A2R013Q01 | Swartruggens Dam | 95.071 | 8.4 | 0.175 | 5 | 49.206 | 5.9 | 1.71 | 5.5 | 7.65 |
| A2R014Q01 | Vaalkop Dam | 346 | 46.7 | 0.95 | 38.3 | 131.4 | 36.4 | 7.28 | 18.4 | 29.4 |
| A2R015Q01 | Roodekopjes Dam | 622 | 128.95 | 0.69 | 94.2 | 174.7 | 86.5 | 9.12 | 32.65 | 44.75 |
| 16Q01 | Leeukraal Dam | 555 | 77.55 | 0.39 | 70.6 | 182.8 | 78.15 | 12.85 | 19.7 | 42.75 |
| A3R001Q01 | Marico-Bosveld Dam | 223 | 9.5 | 0.21 | 5 | 130.8 | 5.8 | 1.701 | 16.8 | 22.95 |
| A3R002Q01 | Klein Maricopoort Dam | 317.5 | 26.8 | 0.54 | 13.9 | 165.7 | 10.8 | 6.23 | 23.1 | 34.1 |
| A3R003Q01 | Kromellen-boog Dam | 126 | 11.8 | 0.29 | 5 | 65.7 | 5.4 | 2.34 | 6.881 | 14.3 |
| A3R004Q01 | Molatedi Dam | 191 | 8.3 | 0.31 | 4.7 | 109.3 | 5.616 | 5.67 | 14.6 | 17.1 |
| C2R001Q01 | Boskop Dam | 489 | 112.7 | 0.156 | 21.4 | 195 | 22.2 | 2.165 | 43.1 | 51.25 |
| C2R002Q01 | Johan Neser Dam | 392 | 54.2 | 0.32 | 11.1 | 187.5 | 16.3 | 6.4 | 30.5 | 36 |
| C2R003Q01 | Klerkskraal Dam | 392.5 | 5.9 | 0.15 | 4.35 | 244.35 | 4.35 | 1.44 | 31.75 | 44.922 |
| C2R004Q01 | Potchefstroom Dam | 512 | 101.5 | 0.16 | 21.3 | 220.4 | 20.5 | 2.28 | 45.1 | 53 |
| C2R005Q01 | Klipdrift Dam | 456 | 98.85 | 0.35 | 55.3 | 134.45 | 54 | 7.955 | 24.5 | 36.3 |
| C2R006Q01 | Elandskuil Dam | 346 | 4.25 | 0.183 | 6.85 | 205.9 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 31.2 | 31 |
| Station | Description | TDS | SO4 | F | Cl | TAL | Na | K | Mg | Ca |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2R001Q01 | Hartbeespoort Dam | 366 | 66 | 0.47 | 47.7 | 113.9 | 42.7 | 9.4 | 16.7 | 32.8 |
| A2R003Q01 | Olifantsnek Dam | 172.066 | 23.7 | 0.2 | 5 | 76.877 | 7.253 | 3.095 | 11.76 | 16.211 |
| A2R005Q01 | Buffelspoort Dam | 42.5 | 5.9 | 0.12 | 4.9 | 18.2 | 1.7 | 1.38 | 3.1 | 3.4 |
| A2R006Q01 | Bospoort Dam | 496 | 79.4 | 0.27 | 99.6 | 126.4 | 81.5 | 13.44 | 22.5 | 32.8 |
| A2R007Q01 | Lindleyspoort Dam | 128 | 12.6 | 0.22 | 5.2 | 65.693 | 5.7 | 3.54 | 8.1 | 11.786 |
| A2R011Q01 | Kosterrivier Dam | 149 | 11.3 | 0.26 | 5.5 | 79 | 6 | 3.69 | 9.8 | 14.8 |
| A2R012Q01 | Klipvoor Dam | 488 | 65.75 | 0.57 | 70.75 | 166.79 | 73.15 | 13.145 | 18.102 | 35.793 |
| A2R013Q01 | Swartruggens Dam | 95.071 | 8.4 | 0.175 | 5 | 49.206 | 5.9 | 1.71 | 5.5 | 7.65 |
| A2R014Q01 | Vaalkop Dam | 346 | 46.7 | 0.95 | 38.3 | 131.4 | 36.4 | 7.28 | 18.4 | 29.4 |
| A2R015Q01 | Roodekopjes Dam | 622 | 128.95 | 0.69 | 94.2 | 174.7 | 86.5 | 9.12 | 32.65 | 44.75 |
| A2R016Q01 | Leeukraal Dam | 555 | 77.55 | 0.39 | 70.6 | 182.8 | 78.15 | 12.85 | 19.7 | 42.75 |
| A3R001Q01 | Marico-Bosveld Dam | 223 | 9.5 | 0.21 | 5 | 130.8 | 5.8 | 1.701 | 16.8 | 22.95 |
| A3R002Q01 | Klein Maricopoort Dam | 317.5 | 26.8 | 0.54 | 13.9 | 165.7 | 10.8 | 6.23 | 23.1 | 34.1 |
| A3R003Q01 | Kromellen-boog Dam | 126 | 11.8 | 0.29 | 5 | 65.7 | 5.4 | 2.34 | 6.881 | 14.3 |
| A3R004Q01 | Molatedi Dam | 191 | 8.3 | 0.31 | 4.7 | 109.3 | 5.616 | 5.67 | 14.6 | 17.1 |
| C2R001Q01 | Boskop Dam | 489 | 112.7 | 0.156 | 21.4 | 195 | 22.2 | 2.165 | 43.1 | 51.25 |
| C2R002Q01 | Johan Neser Dam | 392 | 54.2 | 0.32 | 11.1 | 187.5 | 16.3 | 6.4 | 30.5 | 36 |
| C2R003Q01 | Klerkskraal Dam | 392.5 | 5.9 | 0.15 | 4.35 | 244.35 | 4.35 | 1.44 | 31.75 | 44.922 |
| C2R004Q01 | Potchefstroom Dam | 512 | 101.5 | 0.16 | 21.3 | 220.4 | 20.5 | 2.28 | 45.1 | 53 |
| C2R005Q01 | Klipdrift Dam | 456 | 98.85 | 0.35 | 55.3 | 134.45 | 54 | 7.955 | 24.5 | 36.3 |
| C2R006Q01 | Elandskuil Dam | 346 | 4.25 | 0.183 | 6.85 | 205.9 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 31.2 | 31 |
| C2R007Q01 | Rietspruit Dam | 415 | 4 | 0.16 | 5.7 | 251.8 | 4.1 | 1.19 | 32.5 | 54 |
| C3R001Q01 | Schweizer-Reneke Dam | 291 | 14.3 | 0.49 | 15 | 156.3 | 26.5 | 12.99 | 15.1 | 20.3 |
| C3R003Q01 | Barbers Pan | 1004 | 18.8 | 0.58 | 215.7 | 386.3 | 206.7 | 34.32 | 39.2 | 17.1 |
| C3R006Q01 | Taung Dam | 182.322 | 6.6 | 0.22 | 5.55 | 100.75 | 12.6 | 4.69 | 7.15 | 19.15 |
| D4H026Q01 | Cooke's Lake (Molopo River) | 595 | 38.8 | 0.16 | 52.5 | 304.2 | 29.1 | 3.3 | 55 | 53.4 |
| D4R003Q01 | Disaneng Dam | 354.443 | 16.4 | 0.33 | 25.8 | 184.4 | 31.3 | 6.272 | 24.3 | 23.525 |
| D4R004Q01 | Setumo Dam | 451 | 22.9 | 0.26 | 38.7 | 226.3 | 38 | 6.22 | 35.9 | 28.1 |
| Ecological Importance And Sensitivity Category |
|---|
| Very high Quaternary catchments that are considered unique on a national or even international level based on unique biodiversity (habitat diversity, species diversity, unique species, rare and endangered species). These rivers (in terms of biota and habitat) are usually very sensitive to flow modifications and have no or only a small capacity for use. |
| High Quaternary catchments that are considered to be unique on a national scale due to biodiversity (habitat diversity, species diversity, unique species, rare and endangered species). These rivers (in terms of biota and habitat) may be sensitive to flow modifications but may have a substantial capacity for use. |
| Moderate Quaternary catchments that are considered to be unique on a provincial or local scale due to biodiversity (habitat diversity, species diversity, unique species, rare and endangered species). These rivers (in terms of biota and habitat) are usually not very sensitive to flow modifications and often have a substantial capacity for use. |
| Low/marginal Quaternary catchments that are not unique at any scale. These rivers (in terms of biota and habitat) are generally not very sensitive to flow modifications and usually have a substantial capacity for use. |
| Name | Ecological status |
|---|---|
| Eastern District Council | |
| Hartebeespoort Dam | Moderate |
| Klipvoor Dam | Moderate |
| Vaalkop Dam | Moderate |
| Roodekopjes Dam | Moderate |
| Koster River Dam | Moderate |
| Rustenburg District Council | |
| Bospoort Dam | Moderate |
| Molatedi Dam | Moderate |
| Olifantsnek Dam | Moderate |
| Buffelspoort Dam | Moderate |
| Lindleyspoort Dam | Moderate |
| Central District Council | |
| Kromellenboog Dam | Low/Marginal |
| Marico-Bosveld Dam | Low/Marginal |
| Lehurutshe Dam | Low/Marginal |
| Setumo Dam | No data |
| Disaneng Dam | No data |
| Cookes Lake | No data |
| Southern District Council | |
| Klerkskraal Dam | N/D |
| Boskop Dam | Moderate |
| Klipdrift Dam | Moderate |
| Bloemhof Dam | Moderate |
| Rietspruit Dam | Moderate |
| Johan Neser Dam | Moderate |
| Schweizer-Reneke Dam | Moderate |
| Potchefstroom Dam | Moderate |
| Elandskuil Dam | Moderate |
| Huhudi District Council | |
| Spitskop Dam | Moderate |
| Taung Dam | Moderate |
| Name | Trophic Status | Limitation | Toxic incidents | Dominant Algae | Other Problems |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern District Council | |||||
| Hartebeespoort Dam | Eutrophic - Hypertrophic | P limited | Yes | Cyanobacteria (Microcystis & Anabaena) | Water Hyacinth Fish kills |
| Klipvoor Dam | Hypertrophic | N Limited | Potentially | Cyanobacteria (Microcystis & Anabaena) | Fish kills |
| Vaalkop Dam | Meso- trophic | P limited | Potentially | Cycolotella TrachelomonasCeratium | |
| Roodekopjes Dam | Mesotrophic / Eutrophic | P limited | No | CycolotellaTrachelomonasOocystis | Water hyacinth |
| Koster River Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Rustenburg District Council | |||||
| Bospoort Dam | Hypertrophic | N/D | N/D | Microcystis scum (January 1999) and fish kill (October 1999) | |
| Molatedi Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Olifantsnek Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | Fish kill (September 2000) | |
| Buffelspoort Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Lindleyspoort Dam | Mesotrophic / Eutrophic | N/D | Potentially | Cyanobacteria (Microcystis & Anabaena) | Water primrose |
| Central District Council | |||||
| Kromellenboog Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Marico-Bosveld Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Lehurutshe Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Barbers Pan | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Setumo Dam | Eutrophic | N/D | Potentially | Coelastrum | OocystisAnabaena |
| Disaneng Dam | Mesotrophic | N/D | No | Cosmarium / Oocystis | |
| Cookes Lake | Eutrophic | N/D | Potentially | Cyclotella Mircocystis | |
| Klerkskraal Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Boskop Dam | Mesotrophic | N/d | No | Chrysophyta Chlorophyta | |
| Klipdrift Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Bloemhof Dam | Highly enriched | Light limited | Yes | Cyanobacteria (Microcystis & Anabaena) | Fish kills |
| Rietspruit Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Johan Neser Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Schweizer-Reneke Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Potchefstroom Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Elandskuil Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | ||
| Huhudi District Council | |||||
| Spitskop Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | Incubation point for Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii | |
| Taung Dam | N/D | N/D | N/D | Incubation point for Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii | |
| Catchment | Description | Dominant Pollution type |
|---|---|---|
| Crocodile / Elands Rivers | Eastern District Council |
|
| Marico / Heks Rivers | Rustenburg District Council |
|
| Marico / Molopo Rivers | Central District Council |
|
| Mooi / Vaal Rivers | Southern District Council |
|
| Harts River | Huhudi District Council |
|
| Catchment | Description | Dominant salinisation source |
|---|---|---|
| Crocodile / Elands Rivers | Eastern District Council | Industrial / Agriculture |
| Marico / Heks Rivers | Rustenburg District Council | Geology |
| Marico / Molopo Rivers | Central District Council | Geology |
| Mooi / Vaal Rivers | Southern District Council | Mining |
| Harts River | Huhudi District Council | Agriculture / Geology |
| Act/Guideline/Policy | Description |
|---|---|
| White Paper on Environmental Management Policy | The goals of this policy are:
|
| White Paper on the Conservation and Sustainable use of SA Biological Diversity (GN 1095, 28 July 1997) | The goals of this policy are inter alia:
|
| White Paper on Integrated Pollution and Waste Management for South Africa. (GN 227, 17 March 2000) | The vision for this policy is to develop and maintain an integrated pollution and waste management system that contributes to sustainable development and measurable improvement of the quality of life, by harnessing the energy and commitment of all South Africans for the effective prevention, minimisation and control of pollution and waste. |
| General Policy in terms of the Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989 (GN 51, 21 Jan 1994) | This policy has amongst its aims:
|
| White Paper: A Minerals and Mining Policy for South Africa (GN 2359 20 October 1998) | This policy strives to facilitate the establishment of a balance between a cost effective and competitive mining industry and the imperative to protect the environment. The Policy calls for inter alia:
|
| Minerals Act 50 of 1991 | Sections 38 and 39 of this Act require the holder of a mining authorisation to compile and submit an Environmental Management Programme Report, and undertake rehabilitation of the land surface. The Regulation describes the required processes for environmental management on the site, pecuniary provision in terms of the EMP, performance assessment and monitoring of the provisions of the EMP. |
| National Water Act (36 of 1998) | This Act makes provision for the sustainable and equitable protection, use, development, conservation, and management and control of water resources.Reg 704 relates to the use of water for mining and associated activities. Any person intending to open a new mine must notify DWAF not less than 14 days before commencement of the activity, submit their EMP, notify them of cessation of activity and report any emergency incident (or potential incident) relating to water to DWAF. |
| National Environmental Management Act (107 of 1998) | This Act deals with the prevention and remediation of soil erosion, stocking rates and prohibits the destruction of wetlands.NEMA also deals with Integrated Environmental Management (IEM) - including:
|
| Water Services Act (Act 108 of 1997) |
|
| Class | Ecological Integrity Status |
|---|---|
| A | Unmodified, natural; the resource base reserve has not been decreased - the resource capability has not been exploited. |
| B | Largely natural with few modifications; the resource base reserve has been decreased to a small extent. A small change of natural habitats and biota may have taken place but the ecosystem functions are essentially unchanged. |
| C | Moderately modified; the resource base reserve has been decreased to a moderate extent. A change of natural habitat and biota have occurred but the basic ecosystem functions are still predominantly unchanged. |
| D | Largely modified; the resource base reserve has been decreased to a large extent. Large changes in natural habitat, biota and basic ecosystem functions have occurred. |
| E | Seriously modified; the resource base reserve has been seriously decreased and regularly exceeds the resource base. The loss of natural habitat, biota and basic ecosystem functions is extensive. |
| F | Critically modified; the resource base reserve has been critically decreased and permanently exceeds the resource base. Modifications have reached a critical level and the resource has been modified completely with an almost total loss of natural habitat and biota. In the worst instances the basic ecosystem functions have been destroyed and the changes are irreversible. |
| Response | Negative Outcomes | Positive Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| National Water Act 36 of 1998 | ||
| Development of a national water strategy | Time and finances used to complete the job may exceed its use. Neglects local strategies. | If the strategy is implemented properly, the sustainability of water resources in South Africa may be assured. |
| Development of catchment management strategies | This may be unsuccessful without the co-operation of other government departments and local authorities. | Smaller management units (i.e. catchments are easier to manage, and more control over development and land-use planning is possible). |
| Development of a classification system and setting resource quality objectives | Difficulties in determining a classification system that will suit all needs. | In conjunction with catchment management, this could become a good integrative management tool. |
| Determination of the Reserve | Even if the environmental reserve is determined, basic human needs will still have priority | Will provide information essential to supply planning and water resource development. |
| Integrated Pollution Control through Receiving Water Quality Objectives and Pollution Prevention | Monitoring and enforcement will still be required. Requires the co-operation of all water users. | Will ensure an integrated approach to pollution control. |
| Establishment of CMAs and integrated catchment management | Establishment of CMAs is a long-term project that requires substantial institutional change. | If effective, CMAs will have greater power to ensure sustainable use of water in each catchment in a socially-acceptable and integrative way. |
| Demand management through water pricing | Has substantial economic repercussions for the food-producing sector. | Will create an ethic of awareness of water conservation and the value of water. |
| Water Services Act 108 of 1997 | Increased access to water will increase demand - human need will always take preference over environmental need. | Abstraction easier to manage and control. |
| Driving Forces | Pressures | State | Impacts | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social | Population growth | Mean annual runoff Impoundments Water Quality Wetlands |
Positive impact | Institutional legislation and policy |
| Climate | Changed hydrology | Negative impact | ||
| Mining | Mining activities | |||
| Agriculture | Population growth | |||
| Industry | Population growth | Ecological impact | ||
| Tourism | Population growth | Human impact |
| Source | Flow Rate (l/s) |
|---|---|
| Turffontein | 247 - 492 |
| Gerhardminnebron | 666 - 920 |
| Schoonspruit | 824 - 1998 |
| Olievendraai | 7 |
| Buffelshoek | 19 - 146 |
| Malmane | 19 - 309 |
| Range | Yield [l/s] | DISTRICT |
|---|---|---|
| Very low | <0.1 | Odi 2 |
| Low | 0.1-0.5 | Ganyesa, Christiana, Bloemhof, Schweizer-Reneke, Molopo, Ditsobotla, Rustenburg 1 |
| Medium | 0.5-1.5 | Vryburg 1, Taung, Klerksdorp, Wolmaransstad, Delareyville, Madikwe, Mankwe, Swartruggens, Koster, Bafokeng, Rustenburg 2, Brits, Odi 1, Moretele |
| High | 1.5-5.0 | Vryburg 2, Potchefstroom, Marico, Lehurutse |
| Very high | >5.0 | Kudumane, Ventersdorp, Lichtenburg, Coligny |
| WATER CLASS | NORTH WEST PROVINCE | DISTRICT COUNCILS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bophirima | Southern | Rustenburg | Eastern | Central | ||
| Class 0&1 | 70% | 68% | 75% | 80% | 44% | 78% |
| Class 2 | 18% | 19% | 13% | 15% | 32% | 15% |
| Class 3 | 12% | 13% | 12% | 5% | 24% | 7% |
| Impact | Negative | Positive |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced recharge | Depletion of river flow decreased recharge, drought | |
| Reduced storage | Overexploitation of groundwater (e.g. irrigation), springs lowering yields | Realisation that groundwater resources are not endless and need proper accounting and management |
| Acid mine drainage | Local and regional transfer of contamination from mining operations | |
| Nitrate | Different processes responsible for high nitrate levels | |
| Salinisation | Reduced recharge/storage often accompanied by increased salinisation | |
| General pollution | Increased urbanisation and population development versus need to protect groundwater quality and quantity | |
| Public awareness | Misinterpretations sometimes promoted or misused | Pressure on stakeholders to manage groundwater responsibly |
| Adoption of techniques and approaches allowing for more sustainable development | Resistance to switch from extensive to responsible use of resources | Sustainable and equitable use of groundwater resources |
| Water Class | Nitrate/Nitrite Range [ mg/l N] | Effects |
|---|---|---|
| Class 0 | 0 - 6 | No adverse health effects. |
| Class 1 | 6 - 10 | Rare instances of methaemoglobinaemia in infants, but no effects in adults. Concentrations in this range generally well tolerated. |
| Class 2 | 10 - 20 | Methaemoglobinaemia may occur in infants. No effects in adults. |
| Class 3 | > 20 | Methaemoglobinaemia occurs in infants. Occurrence of mucous membrane irritation in adults. |
| Fluoride Range (mg/l) | Effects |
|---|---|
| 0 - 1.0 | This level in water necessary to meet requirements for healthy tooth structure is a function of daily water intake and hence varies with annual maximum daily air temperature. A level of 0.75 mg/l corresponds to a maximum daily temperature of 26 oC - 28oC. No adverse health effects or tooth damage occurrence. |
| 1.0 - 1.5 | Slight mottling of dental enamel may occur in sensitive individuals. No other health effects are expected. |
| 1.5 - 3.5 | Mottling and tooth damage will probably be noticeable in most continuous users of the water. No other health effects occur |
| 3.5 - 4.0 | Severe tooth damage especially to infant's temporary and permanent teeth; softening of the enamel and dentine will occur on continuous use of water. |
| 4.0 - 6.0 | Severe tooth damage as above. Skeletal fluorosis occurs on long term exposure. |
| 6.0 - 8.0 | Severe tooth damage as above. Pronounced skeletal fluorosis occurs on long-term exposure. |
| > 8.0 | Severe tooth damage as above. Crippling skeletal fluorosis is likely to occur on long term exposure. |
| > 100 | Threshold for onset of acute fluoride poisoning, marked by vomiting and diarrhoea |
| > 2000 | The lethal concentration of fluoride is approximately 2000 mg/l |
| ACTIVITY | SOURCE TYPE | RISK | CONTROL |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGRICULTURE | |||
| Irrigation (return flows) | Diffuse | Low | Difficult |
| Fertilizer application | Diffuse | Low | Difficult |
| Pesticide usage | Diffuse | High | Easy |
| Manure application | Diffuse | Low | Difficult |
| Extensive stock farming | Diffuse | Moderate | Difficult |
| Intensive animal feeding units | Diffuse | High | Difficult |
| MINING | |||
| Discard dumps | Point | High | Difficult |
| Return water dams | Point | Moderate | Easy |
| Ash dumps | Point | Moderate | Easy |
| Slimes dams | Point | High | Easy |
| Stockpiling | Point | Moderate | Easy |
| Underground or opencast mining area | Diffuse | High | Difficult |
| URBAN SECTOR | |||
| Sewage effluent | Point | High | Easy |
| Leaking sewers | Diffuse | Moderate | Easy |
| Sludge drying beds | Point | Moderate | Easy |
| Landfills and dumps | Point | Moderate | Depends on age |
| Storm water | Diffuse | Moderate | Easy |
| Storage tanks and pipes | Diffuse | Moderate | Easy |
| Informal housing | Diffuse | Moderate | Difficult |
| INDUSTRIAL SECTOR | |||
| Industrial effluent | Point | High | Easy |
| Bulk storage of chemicals | Point | High | Easy |
| Solid Waste | Point | High | Difficult |
| Abandoned sites | Point | Moderate | Depends on age |
| Evaporation dams | Point | High | Depends on age |
| Waste irrigation | Point | Moderate | Difficult |
| Air pollution | Diffuse | High | Easy |
| Transportation accidents | Diffuse | High | Easy |
| OTHER ACTIVITIES | |||
| Borehole construction and abandonment | Point | Moderate | Easy |
| Response | Positive outcome | Negative outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Development/entitlement -geared legislation | Assured sustainability if resources managed properly | Increased pressure on resources |
| Groundwater reserve implementation | High confidence in the resource assessment | Costs of assessment |
| Gearing with catchment management agencies and their strategies | Level of participation and community's responsibility for its own affairs increases | Substantial effort for consensual management required |
| EIA processes | Water conservation and management ensured while development continues | Relatively slow and fragmented |
| International treaties (e.g. Molopo) | Preservation of groundwater resources at sustainable level | Possibly less water for the Province |
| Driving Forces | Pressures | State | Impacts | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social | Population growth | Aquifers Water Quality |
Positive impact | Institutional legislation and policy |
| Climate | Groundwater depletion | Negative impact Human impact | ||
| Urbanisation | Industrial demands |
| Issue | Indicator | Type | Level | Frequency | Scale | Linkages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshwater Resources | Surface Water Resources per Capita | S | 1 | 5 yearly | National | CSD Environment |
| Surface Water Demand versus Available Resources | P | 2 | Annual | Primary catchment | CSD Environment | |
| Environmental Flow Requirements | S | 2 | 5 yearly | Primary / secondary catchments | ||
| Water Use (sectoral requirements) | P | 1 | 5 yearly | National | ||
| Groundwater utilised per sector | P | 2 | 5 yearly | National | ||
| People supported by Groundwater | S | 2 | 5 yearly | Provincial | ||
| Groundwater withdrawals as % of annual recharge | P | 2 | 5 yearly | Geo-hydrological unit | ||
| Freshwater Quality | Surface Water Salinity | S | 1 | Annual | Water management areas | |
| Surface Water Nutrients | S | 1 | Annual | Water management areas | ||
| Surface Water Microbiology | S | 2 | Annual | Water management areas | ||
| Surface Water Toxicity | I | 2 | Annual | Water management areas | ||
| Groundwater Salinity | S | 1 | Annual | Geo-hydrological unit | ||
| Groundwater Nitrate | S | 1 | Annual | Geo-hydrological unit | ||
| Groundwater Microbiology | S | 2 | Annual | Geo-hydrological unit | ||
| Freshwater Ecosystem Integrity | Aquatic Habitat Integrity | S | 2 | Annual | Water management areas | |
| Wetland alteration | I | 2/3 | 5 yearly | Quaternary catchment | Ramsar | |
| Aquatic biodiversity | S | 1 | Monthly & Annual | Water management areas | CBD | |
| Alien invasive organisms | P / S | 3 | 5 yearly | Water management areas | ||
| Riparian vegetation | S | 2 | 5 yearly | Water management areas | ||
| Freshwater Ecosystem Integrity | Groundwater contribution to GDP | D | 2 | Annual | Sectoral | |
| Surface water affordability | R | 1 | Annual | National | ||
| Number of people affected by waterborne diseases | R | 2 | Annual | National | ||
| Volume of water imported from neighbouring countries | R | 1 | Annual | National | ||
| Number of people with access to sanitation | S | 1 | Monthly | National | CSD Social, DPLG | |
| Number of people with access to water | S | 1 | Monthly | National | CSD Social, DPLG |







| Land Transformation and Soil Quality | | | Contents | | | Biodiversity and Conservation |